tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888411.post7191330120292157841..comments2024-03-23T05:20:41.018-06:00Comments on Dan Agonistes: Hit 'em Where They AintDan Agonisteshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07863051818485888739noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888411.post-23859147205871113802007-06-15T11:39:00.000-06:002007-06-15T11:39:00.000-06:00Hate to be a pest as I'm working with your data:- ...Hate to be a pest as I'm working with your data:<BR/>- you have two groundball HR in 2003... would this be say an inside the park where the ball would have gone down the line, etc? Thought that was interesting.Tangotigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864323151591103655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888411.post-73233715509701031782007-06-15T11:35:00.000-06:002007-06-15T11:35:00.000-06:00Did you exclude bunts?Did you exclude bunts?Tangotigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864323151591103655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888411.post-25015103430762092162007-06-15T11:26:00.000-06:002007-06-15T11:26:00.000-06:00Dan, great stuff.Can you amend your chart (either ...Dan, great stuff.<BR/><BR/>Can you amend your chart (either add a column, or replace the one I'm going to talk about):<BR/><BR/>The %nonHR would be "better" or more interesting anyway, if you would exclude the HR from both the numerator and denominator.<BR/><BR/>This way, we can make a "DIPS" comparison on fieldable balls.Tangotigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864323151591103655noreply@blogger.com