A kind soul points out to me that Lee Panas over at Tiger Tales takes a look at the 2007 Tigers in terms of their baserunning. To augment his post I thought I'd offer the entire Tigers team in terms of the five baserunning metrics I created.
Opps EqGAR Opps EqSBR Opps EqAAR Opps EqHAR Opps EqOAR Opps EqBRR
Curtis Granderson 43 0.6 28 4.1 60 -0.1 74 2.2 426 -0.6 631 6.2
Gary Sheffield 16 -0.2 28 0.7 41 0.6 44 2.3 249 1.5 378 4.9
Ryan Raburn 6 0.1 2 0.3 4 0.4 17 0.6 79 0.7 108 2.1
Omar Infante 11 0.2 5 0.3 13 -0.2 14 0.1 107 0.6 150 1.0
Cameron Maybin 2 -0.2 5 0.8 1 0.0 3 0.4 26 -0.1 37 1.0
Marcus Thames 5 0.0 3 -0.2 11 0.1 15 1.2 97 -0.4 131 0.7
Placido Polanco 25 -0.3 10 0.4 49 -1.9 67 1.3 423 1.3 574 0.6
Timoniel Perez 9 0.1 2 -0.1 5 0.1 10 0.2 58 0.1 84 0.3
Brandon Inge 24 0.7 11 0.4 35 0.1 37 -1.1 257 0.1 364 0.2
Ramon Santiago 4 0.4 4 0.3 5 0.1 8 -0.6 47 -0.2 68 0.0
Mike Maroth 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.0 3 0.0
Jeremy Bonderman 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.0 6 0.0
Brent Clevlen 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.0 7 0.0
Mike Hessman 2 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 4 -0.1 20 -0.1 27 -0.2
Neifi Perez 1 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.0 3 -0.1 30 -0.1 39 -0.2
Carlos Guillen 31 -0.5 22 -1.5 42 0.4 40 1.6 285 -0.4 420 -0.5
Craig Monroe 15 -0.6 3 -1.1 11 0.0 30 0.4 115 -0.4 174 -1.6
Magglio Ordonez 39 0.5 4 0.0 49 -1.1 58 -0.8 409 -0.8 559 -2.2
Sean Casey 19 -0.2 4 -0.7 34 0.2 24 -1.5 240 -0.1 321 -2.2
Ivan Rodriguez 23 0.1 4 -1.0 33 0.1 38 -0.9 245 -0.6 343 -2.3
Mike Rabelo 10 -0.5 1 -0.4 9 -0.1 9 -1.0 92 -0.3 121 -2.3
285 0.1 136 2.1 408 -1.2 495 4.1 3221 0.3 4545 5.4
Keep in mind that the data Lee shows is really a subset of the EqHAR (Equivalent Hit Advancement Runs) shown here but as Lee points out Gary Sheffield did well in 2007 as did Guillen, Palanco, and Monroe.
3 comments:
Thanks for posting this Dan. I actually did look at all four types of base running advancements at Tiger tales (not just HAR). Your method is more complete though. Mine is somewhere between your method and the Bill James Handbook method. Still, I was curious to see how our rankings compared. There are a couple of differences in the rankings but pretty good agreement overall.
I also want to offer a belated congratulations for getting your work mentioned extensively in the NY Times. That's not only great for you but also for the whole saber community.
Lee
Thanks Lee. Yep, the rankings look pretty consistent. Because the sample sizes are pretty small the differences probably boil down to high impact plays in terms of base/out situation.
喝花酒
酒店喝酒
暑假打工
寒假打工
酒店小姐
酒店兼職
禮服店
酒店經紀
酒店兼差
酒店
酒店經紀人
酒店現領
酒店經紀爆米花
酒店經紀
酒店打工
酒店上班
假日打工
台北酒店經紀
酒店pt
酒店pt
酒店應酬
粉味
酒店經紀PRETTY GIRL
酒店經濟
酒店經濟
晚上兼差
Post a Comment